NiveshMultiplierNivesh Multiplier
    Fund Comparison

    ICICI Prudential Midcap vs Edelweiss Mid Cap — Which is Better in 2026?

    ICICI Prudential Midcap vs Edelweiss Mid Cap: 23.770% vs 23.880% 3Y returns. Compare risk, portfolio overlap & expense ratios side-by-side.

    AI GeneratedReviewed by Shivank RastogiUpdated 5 April 2026 3 min read
    Overlap
    26.72%

    Common portfolio exposure between the two funds.

    Common Stocks
    30

    Shared holdings driving the overlap score.

    Compared Funds
    2

    Head-to-head breakdown of returns, risk, and portfolio positioning.

    Returns Comparison

    Return comparison across the ranked funds using trailing 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y performance.

    Rolling Returns

    Rolling return ranges show how consistently each fund has delivered over time.

    Max Drawdown

    Drawdown highlights the peak-to-trough downside each fund has faced in recent periods.

    Portfolio Overlap

    Portfolio overlap shows which shared holdings contribute most to similarity between the compared funds.

    Common Holdings

    CompanyContribution
    Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd.2.34%
    APL Apollo Tubes Ltd.2.00%
    BSE Ltd.1.73%
    SRF Ltd.1.63%
    Kei Industries Ltd.1.54%
    Jindal Stainless Ltd.1.54%
    Cummins India Ltd.1.47%
    GE Vernova T&D India Ltd1.34%
    Bharat Forge Ltd.1.32%
    PB Fintech Ltd.1.31%
    Muthoot Finance Ltd.1.16%
    Polycab India Ltd.1.01%
    Navin Fluorine International Ltd.0.94%
    Bharti Hexacom Ltd.0.88%
    Prestige Estates Projects Ltd.0.86%
    Schaeffler India Ltd.0.82%
    Blue Star Ltd.0.77%
    Hitachi Energy India Ltd.0.63%
    UNO Minda Ltd.0.51%
    360 One Wam Ltd.0.51%
    Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd.0.45%
    National Aluminium Company Ltd.0.41%
    Astral Ltd.0.31%
    Supreme Industries Ltd.0.30%
    Oberoi Realty Ltd.0.23%
    Endurance Technologies Ltd.0.21%
    HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd.0.17%
    Escorts Kubota Ltd.0.12%
    JK Cement Ltd.0.11%
    Torrent Power Ltd.0.11%

    Detailed Fund Metrics

    Fund NameAUM (Cr)Exp RatioAlphaSharpe Ratio1Y Ret3Y Ret5Y RetRoll 3YDD 1YRecovery 1Y
    ICICI Prudential Midcap Direct Plan GrowthEquity • Mid Cap
    ₹7280.381.050%3.64140.959913.630%23.770%18.880%24.05%11.86%-
    Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan GrowthEquity • Mid Cap
    ₹14355.220.490%3.88010.98045.320%23.880%20.250%23.95%12.81%-

    Introduction: The Battle of the Heavyweights

    In the competitive landscape of mid-cap equity funds, two contenders stand out: ICICI Prudential Midcap Direct Plan Growth and Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth. Both funds aim to capitalize on the growth potential of mid-sized companies, but they do so with different strategies and performance outcomes. This blog post will provide a comprehensive comparison to help investors make informed decisions based on their specific financial goals.

    Performance Breakdown: Returns vs Risk

    When evaluating the performance of these two funds, we must consider both returns and risk metrics.

    Rolling Returns

    • ICICI Prudential Midcap has demonstrated impressive rolling returns over various periods:

      • 6 months: -0.29%
      • 1 year: 16.04%
      • 3 years: 24.05%
      • 5 years: 19.41%
    • Edelweiss Mid Cap has shown:

      • 6 months: -5.87%
      • 1 year: 5.32%
      • 3 years: 23.95%
      • 5 years: 20.63%

    Conclusion: ICICI Prudential has outperformed Edelweiss in both the 1-year and 6-month rolling returns, indicating stronger short-term performance.

    Capital Protection During Market Crashes

    • Max Drawdown:

      • ICICI Prudential: -11.86% (1 year), -21.27% (3 years)
      • Edelweiss: -12.81% (1 year), -20.06% (3 years)
    • Recovery Days:

      • ICICI Prudential: Data not available
      • Edelweiss: 313 days (3 years)

    Conclusion: While both funds exhibit significant drawdowns, ICICI Prudential has a slightly better max drawdown in the 1-year period. However, the absence of recovery days data for ICICI Prudential makes it difficult to fully assess its capital protection capabilities.

    Risk-Adjusted Performance

    • Sharpe Ratio:

      • ICICI Prudential: 0.9599
      • Edelweiss: 0.9804
    • Sortino Ratio:

      • ICICI Prudential: 1.2385
      • Edelweiss: 1.1688
    • Alpha:

      • ICICI Prudential: 3.6414
      • Edelweiss: 3.8801

    Conclusion: Edelweiss has a higher Sharpe Ratio, indicating better returns per unit of risk. However, ICICI Prudential's superior Sortino Ratio suggests it offers better downside risk protection. In terms of Alpha, Edelweiss slightly edges out ICICI Prudential, indicating a marginally better outperformance against its benchmark.

    Portfolio Overlap & Sector Bets

    Both funds have a notable overlap of 26.72% in their holdings, which includes companies like Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd. and APL Apollo Tubes Ltd. However, their sector allocations differ significantly:

    Top 5 Sectors

    • ICICI Prudential:

      • Metals & Mining: 18.68%
      • Capital Goods: 13.77%
      • Services: 12.88%
      • Chemicals: 12.28%
      • Financial: 10.04%
    • Edelweiss:

      • Financial: 24.22%
      • Capital Goods: 10.15%
      • Services: 9.83%
      • Automobile: 9.37%
      • Healthcare: 8.33%

    Conclusion: ICICI Prudential's heavy allocation in Metals & Mining has likely contributed to its stronger recent performance, especially in a recovering economy. In contrast, Edelweiss's focus on Financials may have limited its short-term returns, particularly in a volatile market.

    The Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?

    • ICICI Prudential Midcap Direct Plan Growth is better suited for aggressive investors looking for strong short-term performance and capital protection during market downturns. Its higher rolling returns and better Sortino Ratio make it an attractive option for those willing to accept higher volatility.

    • Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth, with its slightly better Sharpe Ratio and Alpha, is ideal for long-term investors who prioritize risk-adjusted returns and are comfortable with a more conservative approach. Its lower expense ratio also makes it a cost-effective choice for investors focused on long-term growth.

    In conclusion, both funds have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

    Optimize Your Specific Portfolio

    Our AI doesn't just rank funds; it analyzes your exact holdings to find overlap, high expenses, and underperformance.

    Our Methodology

    Nivesh Composite Score

    Funds are ranked using a min-max normalised composite score computed across all active funds in the same sub-category. Each metric is scaled 0–100 relative to category peers and then weighted:

    FactorWeightWhy it matters
    5-Year Return30%Long-term compounding ability
    3-Year Return30%Medium-term consistency
    1-Year Return20%Recent momentum
    Sharpe Ratio15%Return generated per unit of risk
    Alpha5%Outperformance vs benchmark

    A fund scoring 85/100 means it ranks in the top 15% of its category across all five dimensions combined.

    Rolling Returns (CAGR)

    We compute point-to-point CAGR from actual daily NAV data rather than relying on declared fund returns. For periods over 1 year, the formula is:

    CAGR = (Latest NAV ÷ Historical NAV)^(1/years) − 1

    NAV values are matched within a ±15-day window to handle weekends and market holidays. Periods covered: 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

    Maximum Drawdown

    Drawdown measures the worst peak-to-trough fall a fund experienced over a given period. We track:

    • Max Drawdown %: The deepest decline from any previous all-time high within the window
    • Recovery Days: How many calendar days the fund took to climb back to its pre-drawdown peak (null = still recovering)

    We compute drawdowns over 1-year and 3-year windows from daily NAV data.

    Annualised Volatility

    Volatility is calculated as the standard deviation of daily logarithmic returns, annualised by multiplying by √252 (trading days per year). A fund with 18% annualised volatility means a ₹1,00,000 investment could swing by roughly ±₹18,000 in a typical year.

    Data Sources

    All NAV data is sourced from AMFI India. Performance metrics, holdings, and AUM figures come from fund house disclosures and are refreshed daily. Expense ratios, Sharpe ratios, Sortino ratios, and Alpha are sourced from standardised SEBI-mandated fund factsheets.

    Related Reads

    Compared Funds

    Fund 1
    Very High Risk

    ICICI Prudential Midcap Direct Plan Growth

    Alpha3.64
    Sortino1.24
    Roll 3Y24.05%
    DD 1Y11.86%
    Top Holdings
    Jindal Steel Ltd.4.76%
    APL Apollo Tubes Ltd.4.37%
    Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd.4.16%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio26.72%
    Common stocks30
    ₹7280.38 CrExp: 1.050%
    Fund 2
    Very High Risk

    Edelweiss Mid Cap Direct Plan Growth

    Alpha3.88
    Sortino1.17
    Roll 3Y23.95%
    DD 1Y12.81%
    Top Holdings
    Marico Ltd.2.43%
    Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd.2.34%
    The Federal Bank Ltd.2.33%
    Overlap Snapshot
    Shared portfolio26.72%
    Common stocks30
    ₹14355.22 CrExp: 0.490%